The Need for Realpolitik in Oromo Politics

The need for realpolitik in Oromo politics


By Abboomaa M. Gadaa

None of these, including the PM,  have power under the TPLF regime. They are only messengers. They all are employees of the TPLF to serve the interests its interest.

It is not inaccurate to state that a significant number of the Oromo hold certain misguided views about politics in general, the most puzzling of which is the belief that most politicians put the collective interest ahead of their personal interests. Further, the notion that good-faith negotiations with adversaries can yield winning strategies in political games involving actors with competing interests, appears to have some credence among a surprisingly large segment of the Oromo. In the real world, however, only hard-nosed analyses of alternative game plans, not good-faith negotiations, produce dominant strategies in political games where the participants are self-interested actors. It is also well-understood that, generally speaking, political actors put their personal interests ahead of the collective interest, and would pursue the former at the expense of the latter – even in democracies – if they can get away with it.

I think the recent uncritical and naive embrace of the so-called Oromo People’s Democratic Organization (OPDO) by many – notwithstanding the atrocious record of this satellite organization – can be understood in this light. Anyone with some understanding of Ethiopia’s treacherous political landscape, and capable of a serious reflection on how politics is conducted in the real world in general, would not have taken to heart the ‘coming to Jesus’ drama some OPDO officials performed (the drama was probably written and directed by the architects of Tigray People’s Liberation Front [TPLF]) to quell the ongoing popular resistance movement led by Qeerroo Bilisummaa Oromo (QBO). (Note: I’m not suggesting that there are not many Oromo nationalists within the OPDO.)

The saddest part is that some of the most popular Oromo activists have bought into the storyline hook, line, and sinker. On one occasion recently, we were being informed that agents of the regime were caught by Oromia police while trying to assassinate the leaders of OPDO. One does not need to be an astute political observer to see that this story was concocted by the TPLF as a trial balloon for two main reasons: 1) to gauge public opinion whether there is going to be a push back should there be a need to eliminate a few nationalist leaders of the OPDO that may not tow the TPLF line; and, 2) to ingratiate the OPDO, as an institution, to the rebelling Oromo public, presenting it as a legitimate political organization, with the purpose of destabilizing the fragile consensus that has been created among the Oromo public through the selfless sacrifices of the Oromo youth.

Through a series of well-considered political moves, including well-designed trial balloons such as the one mentioned above, the TPLF has been trying to divide the Oromo public into feuding parts – with some supporting the largely underground QBO movement, and others falling in line with the ‘new OPDO’ – allowing the regime to buy precious time to carry out its ‘colonizing project’. (I am using the word colonizing here liberally.)

I am not entirely certain why some in the Oromo political community keep repeating the same mistakes over and over while dealing with the political forces in Ethiopia. What Asafa Jalata calls ‘political ignorance’ might indeed be one of the numerous proximate reasons for the unenviable political position we occupy today in the country. There might be more underlying factors at play; and at the risk of oversimplification, I’m going to offer two of them here. By the way, neither of the explanations are offered as original ideas.

The first one can be described in terms of who we are as a people: I argue that our democratic culture and openness, which can be our greatest assets in the long run, are working against us in the subterfuge-based Ethiopian political culture; where good-faith negotiations to settle political disputes have never been the norm, and the winner takes all by eliminating competing forces, often brutally. Ethiopia’s modern history is replete with unmarked graves of Oromo giants who committed the costly mistake of engaging Ethiopian political forces in good faith, trying to institute a win-win political formula that could accommodate the diverse interests of the groups making up the country. Ras Ali the II, Gobena Daacee, Haile Fida and many other Oromo notables had one ‘sin’ in common: they were trying – unsuccessfully and to their own detriment in the end – to create the Ethiopia of their dreams through open and good-faith negotiations with their political adversaries.

The other explanation for the baffling state of affairs in Oromo politics is a general human condition, and it deals with the natural inclination of political actors to put their self-interest ahead of the public interest. Notwithstanding the general disposition among the Oromo to readily embrace their rhetorically-gifted political elites as selfless actors, the latter (if not all) often exhibit insufficient concern for the common good, with some using our collective aspirations as a bargaining chip to promote their personal agenda. For instance, some of the diaspora-based aspiring Oromo politicians started out supporting the QBO, before they turned around and threw them under the TPLF-manufactured-OPDO-bus, when the youth leaders refused to heed their silly and dangerous dictates. Now, with the so-called democratic centralism reasserting itself within the EPRDF, as should have been expected, and the OPDO expected to play the role for which it was invented; the self-appointed diaspora-based “leaders” of the Oromo movement might finally be running out of options, though we can be sure that they will continue to present a serious challenge to the QBO-led liberation project.

The simple lesson? Pursuing faith-based politics will not get the Oromo to the promised-land; a healthy dose of realpolitik will!

January 1, 2018



1 Comment

  1. Self-praising and personal cult are foreign to Oromo culture. These are recent developments. Combined with personal ego, persons with such behaviour become detrimental to the Oromo Quest for national liberation, since such persons sneak to the forefronts of the national movement only to put their personal gain before the national cause.
    National Liberation from colonial bondage requires selfless leaders with the vision, stamina and patience to lead their people through all the political vagaries of the time. It also needs united and determined persons concious of what it needs to liberate their people from servitude in the era of global capital aka neo-colonialism.
    Every Oromo shouting the liberation slogan or waving the liberation flag at mass rallies is not a nationalist. In the Diaspora, we have Oromos of all coleure: few (really few) true nationalists (most of which are silently observing the current hohoho about opdo), genuine Oromos who really feel the agonies of their people back home and want to contribute what they can, some agents of EPRDF/OPDO masquerading as activists in the social media and popular activities and misguiding the unsuspecting mass, and a sizeable number who hide behind religion or otherwise have shut their ears & eyes to the Oromo plight and go their personal businesses.
    In my opinion, what we lack is a unifying national agenda and a true leadership that is guided by it. A unifying national agenda would end the unnecessary squables and infighting and puts our goal in clear terms. It would clear the murky waters where TPLFites now muddle and try to fish recruits among ourselves. We need realpolitik with clear vision!

Comments are closed.